The following continues the serialization of SIMPLE SOLUTION ESSAYS:
Is this Barack Obama in 2009? Nope, Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933. The Great Depression faced an unemployment rate of 25%, and our pre-recession worry is all of 6.1%. But how high is it going? What needs to be done?
There was also an accompanying Great Drought beginning in the early 1930's. But the stock market then largely recovered only a few months after October 29, 1929. Ironically enough, while the New Deal should be given some credit, the beginning of World War II in the later 1930's was the spark that boosted the economy, and there are respected historians who even then partially blamed conflict over oil as an important catalyst for war itself.
-
The
presidential election was only a few weeks away, and while our unemployment
rate on 25September08
was still 6.1%, it was obvious that something terrible was beginning to happen
to our economy. Some say oil was a
key reason for World War II, and that $147/barrel spike in July frightened the
investment community. Many blame
housing for triggering the crash, but like the previous serious recession in
the early 1980’s, behind this all was the metastability of petroleum. (Remember now, the following was written in the previous presidential election period, a little more than a month before the day Obama faced McCain, so you must project yourself back to that time period.)
Whoops, We Might Be On the Verge of Economic Calamity
"The
newly elected President blamed excesses of big business for causing the
unstable bubble-like economy. Democrats believed the problem was that business
had too much power and regulation of the economy was necessary."
Is this Barack Obama in 2009? Nope, Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933. The Great Depression faced an unemployment rate of 25%, and our pre-recession worry is all of 6.1%. But how high is it going? What needs to be done?
There was also an accompanying Great Drought beginning in the early 1930's. But the stock market then largely recovered only a few months after October 29, 1929. Ironically enough, while the New Deal should be given some credit, the beginning of World War II in the later 1930's was the spark that boosted the economy, and there are respected historians who even then partially blamed conflict over oil as an important catalyst for war itself.
Today,
we are faced with the same, but more complex world, again shaped by petroleum. (Thought some of you might be interested in the "real" price of crude oil--at least in terms of 2008 dollars, since the Civil War, above. Note that each peak linked with a major war or crisis--Civil, Second Energy Crisis and current recession. But which came first?
Crude oil futures experienced an all time high jump of $25/barrel on Monday,
and settled at $121/bbl for the day. This was more than double the previous
high spike of June 6, when the increase was $10.75/bbl. Okay, pundits blame the
arcane future's trading process, not necessarily the Congressional mortgage
bailout. Further, we can expect Congress to reign in that market, as it is
doing with Wall Street. Sure, oil prices descended to $106/bbl the next day,
but the metastable nature of the beast is ominous. Do you get a sense that we
are beginning to lose control?
Crude oil futures experienced an all time high jump of $25/barrel on Monday,
and settled at $121/bbl for the day. This was more than double the previous
high spike of June 6, when the increase was $10.75/bbl. Okay, pundits blame the
arcane future's trading process, not necessarily the Congressional mortgage
bailout. Further, we can expect Congress to reign in that market, as it is
doing with Wall Street. Sure, oil prices descended to $106/bbl the next day,
but the metastable nature of the beast is ominous. Do you get a sense that we
are beginning to lose control?
How
does the $700 billion to $1 trillion bailout compare to other wartime
expenditures and rescues? On July 29 I published a HuffPo article entitled, Billions and Trillions. I reported that the sum total of the Manhattan Project (Atomic Bombs for
Hiroshima and Nagasaki), Marshall (former general who was Secretary of State when he initiated this) Plan (to save West Berlin and post-war
Europe) and Apollo Project (Man on the Moon) in terms of 2008 dollars, was
roughly $240 billion. The amount of money actually spent was only $38 billion,
but inflation relative to those times brings this value to a quarter
trillion today, about a third the amount being discussed to resuscitate Wall
Street. (Reflect on this, please: our current rescue of Wall Street cost us three times more than the Manhattan Project, Marshall Plan and the Apollo Project, combined!!!)
First,
where is this money coming from? Well, the combination of your tax dollars and
foreign investments. If that was so easy, why didn't we solve our energy
problem when voters were asking for relief a couple of months ago? As an aside, you should be shocked that the average household spent the following amount on gasoline/month since this posting:
(Do you know what your family is spending this year?)
(Do you know what your family is spending this year?)
Through
the summer we all decried the sorry state of our energy condition and wondered
why we were not more prepared, for we should have learned our lesson after the
First Energy Crisis of 1973 (gasoline lines to the left--something we haven't seen in a long, long, long time), but did not, and certainly after the Second Energy
Crisis of 1979, but, again, did not. As we talk about billions and trillions,
and reflect on the nearly $2 billion we were spending daily on gasoline in
America in July and continued to look away at how much our federal government
was allowing for renewable energy research (only an average of $1 billion/year
for the past decade), our Democratic Congress still could not even bother to
renew those renewable energy tax credits nor approve any global warming rescue
package. As early as June 14, my HuffPo was entitled, Piffle Squared, lamenting the idiocy of this all.
Now,
what makes the most serious environmental challenge ever presented to humanity
and $147/barrel oil so insignificant? Why is saving Wall Street so important?
Is it because the White House likes high oil prices and mocks the Greenhouse
Effect? Could it be that Republicans can identify with high finance and were
put into office by those who are today being rescued? Secretary of the Treasury
Henry Paulson came from being the CEO of Goldman Sachs (which was also saved).
Incidentally, he worked for President Richard Nixon, and more specifically, was
an assistant to John Ehrlichman.
Nah,
my sense is that we are in serious trouble and the White House just had to take
those bold steps. I congratulate our leaders for taking action. I do, though,
wonder about the attitude of the American Public when it comes to the looming
dual hammer of Peak Oil and Global Warming. There is no National Will to do
anything on this front. Somehow, I think that these virtual news portals might
well be the solution to galvanize instant public reaction. Protest marches are
so last generation. The world-wide web is the mechanism best suited to prevent
what appears to be an imminent economic and environmental calamity. But how?
You, out there, help!
Comments
(8): Yes, most agreed with me that
a mini-doom was to befall, and there was nothing we could do about it.
Four
days later, 29September08, the stock market did, in fact, crash, the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropping 778. So my simple solution was for Congress
and the White House to do nothing, giving good reasons why. There was a part 2 to this posting, for the very next day, I published:
which I will dress up in a follow-up article to continue this SIMPLE SOLUTION ESSAYS series later. It is , indeed, interesting to re-live history.
Simple Solution for Our Fiscal Mess
which I will dress up in a follow-up article to continue this SIMPLE SOLUTION ESSAYS series later. It is , indeed, interesting to re-live history.
-








No comments:
Post a Comment