The coronavirus COVID-19 is affecting 209 countries and territories around the world and 2 international conveyances. The day is reset after midnight GMT+0.
New cases:
DAY China Italy USA Spain Germany S. Korea WORLD
DAY China Italy USA Spain Germany S. Korea WORLD
Mar 23 9 601 85 435 24 7 1631
24 7 743 100 489 33 9 1983
25 4 683 129 454 47 6 1987
26 6 712 73 498 33 5 1801
27 5 919 182 569 71 8 2782
28 3 889 241 674 52 5 2609
29 5 756 169 624 49 8 2706
30 4 812 271 537 19 6 2849
31 5 837 439 553 37 4 3661
Apr 1 7 727 589 463 83 3 3239
2 6 760 522 709 158 4 4183
29 5 756 169 624 49 8 2706
30 4 812 271 537 19 6 2849
31 5 837 439 553 37 4 3661
Apr 1 7 727 589 463 83 3 3239
2 6 760 522 709 158 4 4183
3 4 766 716 587 123 5 3822
4 4 681 769 546 55 3 4755
5 3 525 909 471 106 6 3595
6 2 636 874 528 78 3 4414
5 3 525 909 471 106 6 3595
6 2 636 874 528 78 3 4414
The matter of ventilators has been one of the more vexing ones. First, when the infection hits, no one location has enough. Because responsible healthcare administrators and government leaders feel responsible, the available ones become expensive because of the supply-demand factor. Hindsight, sure, but the Federal government should have two months ago taken control for the nation, as Governor Andrew Cuomo did for New York.
But is the ventilator really that important? It is appearing that only around 20% of those placed on ventilators survive, or 80% die. This from Governor Andrew Cuomo. Reliable studies are not available. From another source the survival rate is much less:
We have some early published data on percentages which vary widely. A paper from China involved 710 Covid-19 patients; 52 were admitted to an ICU. Of the 22 who eventually required mechanical ventilation, 19 (86%) died. Another early study reported 31 of 32 (97%) mechanically ventilated patients died.
But a recently released study of 24 patients said:
A study of 24 of the most critically ill patients with COVID-19, early on in the pandemic, indicated a high mortality rate, and a prolonged time on respirators for the patients who did survive the virus’ attack.
This study, published March 30 in the New England Journal of Medicine, saw a mortality rate of 50 percent. Most of the patients in the study spent an average of 10 days on a ventilator. Usually the average time a patient in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) spends on a ventilator ranges from 3 to 7 days, according to one study.
Mind you, this more optimistic report only had 24 patients. But 50% is a whole lot better than a 90% death rate.
To many, a compelling humanitarian argument can be made that ventilators, indeed, are crucial, for saving one life might make up for all that cost and effort. But does it pass the economic/social value test for limited resources to combat this war? What is more important, a $50,000 ventilator or $3 for personal protection equipment? About PPE, this does not need to be that spacesuit system. Great if we have enough of them, and especially so if I was the one affected.
But way back in December I bought ten masks from Daiso for $1 (10 cents each), ten sets of gloves from that same store for $1 (or 10 cents each) and have a plastic raincoat which couldn't have cost more than a dollar. My mask is not good enough in a coronavirus facility, but in February the N95 face mask sold only for $1.82. With a $3 to $50,000 ratio, you can get 16,666 PPE outfits (which are easier and much quicker to make) for one ventilator.
Of course you want to do both, and if our nation had reacted earlier, we could have had them available, but in time of desperate shortages, is our current strategy wise? The Federal government is running around in circles, quarreling with states and companies, having no one truly in charge. The person who should have that authority is Vice President Pence. But have you seen his ineptness, bowing to Trump at every turn, and waffling instead of leading? One major difference between Republicans and Democrats is that the former party believes states should take the lead. But this is a war, and centralized authority is imperative.
To many, a compelling humanitarian argument can be made that ventilators, indeed, are crucial, for saving one life might make up for all that cost and effort. But does it pass the economic/social value test for limited resources to combat this war? What is more important, a $50,000 ventilator or $3 for personal protection equipment? About PPE, this does not need to be that spacesuit system. Great if we have enough of them, and especially so if I was the one affected.But way back in December I bought ten masks from Daiso for $1 (10 cents each), ten sets of gloves from that same store for $1 (or 10 cents each) and have a plastic raincoat which couldn't have cost more than a dollar. My mask is not good enough in a coronavirus facility, but in February the N95 face mask sold only for $1.82. With a $3 to $50,000 ratio, you can get 16,666 PPE outfits (which are easier and much quicker to make) for one ventilator.
Of course you want to do both, and if our nation had reacted earlier, we could have had them available, but in time of desperate shortages, is our current strategy wise? The Federal government is running around in circles, quarreling with states and companies, having no one truly in charge. The person who should have that authority is Vice President Pence. But have you seen his ineptness, bowing to Trump at every turn, and waffling instead of leading? One major difference between Republicans and Democrats is that the former party believes states should take the lead. But this is a war, and centralized authority is imperative.
What the ventilator does is to transfer responsibility from a physician to a machine. This has good psychological value.
Research is sketchy, but one study showed that the mortality rate of non-COVID-19 patients receiving advanced respiratory support showed a death rate of 36%. Clearly, then, given a choice, a doctor should give preference to them, and especially so if the actual death rate of COVID-19 patients on ventilators is closer to 90%. At this point, this issue is not clearly understood, with the medical field attempting to catch up with reality. A lot more to come.
No way to end a posting on such a gloomy note. My coronavirus moment of the day:
No way to end a posting on such a gloomy note. My coronavirus moment of the day:
- I was holding this container and in the midst of a process, a smidgen of this "virus" contaminated my other hand.
- I had a napkin, which was previously used to wipe off the outside of the container, so attempting to clean this other hand with it was a big mistake, for the hand became even more soiled, with a portion of the "virus" jumping to my shirt.
- Then, particularly dumb to use this same napkin to clean my shirt caused a stain, with bits of this "virus" falling unto my thigh and floor
Fortunately, this "virus" was cream of wheat. I heated some of this breakfast goo in my microwave oven. I should have used one minute or less, but somehow pressed two minutes. A small amount of this blob boiled over. So I carefully wiped it with a napkin. The rest is the story above.
To close, does this photo and caption remind you of anyone in particular?
-









ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น